IS OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH REALLY NECESSARY?

by | Jun 15, 2017

In the case of Pacey v Caterpillar Logistics, the employer decided to dismiss an employee who was on long-term sick due to a bad back, but whom was ‘caught on camera’ doing a range of normal things including driving, shopping etc.

Caterpillar Logistics said that Pacey had exaggerated his injury and sacked him. But when the employee explained the allegation away, saying that his GP had advised ‘light exercise’ (corroborated by the GP) the tribunal found the dismissal to be unfair. 

Because the investigation that was carried out was found to be insufficient – there should have been an occupational health assessment. 

Had the employer invested in an occupational health report which substantiated their conclusions, the outcome could have been a whole lot different. Instead they assumed their own minimal medical knowledge to reach their conclusions.

Occupational Health reports are an important document when trying to dismiss an employee for ill health, please contact me for further information. 

 

Pause for Thought October 2024 Newsletter

As we enter into autumn season, it’s a wonderful time to focus on emotional well-being. Autumn is a fabulous time to start to snuggle down and  create a fulfilling and balanced life, feeling as well as you possibly can be. It's a perfect time  to reflect on how we can...

October 2024 Newsletter

It's officially Autumn with Halloween this month! Labour has delivered on its promise to publish its Employment Rights Bill within the first 100 days in government: The Bill itself is not expected to pass into law until June or July next year. Day 1 right: The...